}

#

Anglophone Nietzsche Research

Discourse, Power and Delusion

Michel Foucault's Nietzsche Interpretation Revisited

Discourse, Power and Delusion

Michel Foucault's Nietzsche Interpretation Revisited

17.2.25
Paul Stephan

The humanities scene recently experienced a minor sensation: In the estate of Michel Foucault (1926—1984), one of the most important representatives of post-structuralism, its editors came across an elaborate book manuscript with the title Le discours philosophique, on which the avowed Nietzschean had worked in 1966. It was published in German by Suhrkamp in 2024. Nietzsche plays a decisive role in this comprehensive analysis of philosophical discourse since Descartes. Paul Stephan takes this event as an opportunity to take a closer look at the most influential Nietzsche interpretation of the 20th century to date.

The humanities scene recently experienced a minor sensation: In the estate of Michel Foucault (1926—1984), one of the most important representatives of post-structuralism, its editors came across an elaborate book manuscript entitled Le Discours Philosophique, which the avowed Nietzschean had worked on in 1966. In 2024, it was published in German by Suhrkamp. Nietzsche plays a decisive role in this comprehensive analysis of philosophical discourse since Descartes. Paul Stephan takes this event as an opportunity to take a closer look at the most influential Nietzsche interpretation of the 20th century to date.

“The Most Noble Adversary”

Daniel Tutt and Henry Holland in Dialogue

“The Most Noble Adversary”

Daniel Tutt and Henry Holland in Dialogue

13.11.24
Henry Holland & Daniel Tutt

After two previous contributions to Nietzsche in the Anglosphere For this blog, Henry Holland interviewed American thinker Daniel Tutt about his perspective on Nietzsche as the most important antagonist of the left. The discussion included Huey Newton, leader of the Black Panthers in the 1970s, and what his “parasitic” way of reading Nietzsche prompted him to read. An unedited and unabridged version of this interview, in original English, can be heard and watched on Tutt's YouTube channel (link).

After two previous posts about Nietzsche in the Anglosphere for this blog, Henry Holland interviewed the American thinker Daniel Tutt about his perspective on Nietzsche as the most important antagonist of the left. The discussion included Huey Newton, leader of the Black Panthers in the 1970s, and what his “parasitic” way of reading Nietzsche prompted him to read. An unedited and unabridged version of this interview, in original English, can be heard and viewed on Tutt's YouTube channel (link).

A Day in the Life of Nietzsche's Future

Report on the Conference Nietzsche's Futures in Weimar

A Day in the Life of Nietzsche's Future

Report on the Conference Nietzsche's Futures in Weimar

5.11.24
Paul Stephan

From October 7 to 11, 2024, the event organized by the Klassik Stiftung Weimar took place in Weimar Nietzsche's futures. Global Conference on the Futures of Nietzsche instead of. Our regular author Paul Stephan was on site on the first day and gives an insight into the current state of academic discussions about Nietzsche. His question: What is the future of Nietzsche academic research when viewed from the perspective of Nietzsche's own radical understanding of the future?

From October 7 to 11, 2024, the Nietzsche Zukunft event, organized by the Klassik Stiftung Weimar, took place in Weimar. Global Conference on the Futures of Nietzsche will take place. Our regular author Paul Stephan was there on the first day and gives an insight into the current state of academic discussions about Nietzsche. His question: What is the future of Nietzsche academic research when viewed from the perspective of Nietzsche's own radical understanding of the future?

Nietzsche Against the Body’s Naysayers

A Conversation with Philosopher and YouTuber Jonas Čeika

Nietzsche Against the Body’s Naysayers

A Conversation with Philosopher and YouTuber Jonas Čeika

8.8.24
Henry Holland & Jonas Čeika

After discussing Jonas Čeika's book How to Philosophize with a Hammer and Sickle and bis YouTube channel (CCK Philosophy) (link), Henry Holland interviewed the American about the blockages of academic philosophy, Nietzsche's relevance as a thinker on the “guideline of the body,” and about tensions between his claim as an anti-philosopher and his social position.

After discussing Jonas Čeika's book How to Philosophize with a Hammer and Sickle and bis YouTube channel (CCK Philosophy) (link), Henry Holland interviewed the American about the blockages of academic philosophy, Nietzsche's relevance as a thinker on the “guideline of the body,” and about tensions between his claim as an anti-philosopher and his social position.

Wrangling Over The Will: The Nietzschean-Marxian Legacy

About Jonas Čeika's How to Philosophize with a Hammer and Sickle

Wrangling Over The Will: The Nietzschean-Marxian Legacy

About Jonas Čeika's How to Philosophize with a Hammer and Sickle

26.4.24
Henry Holland

Nietzsche has repeatedly become the subject of political interpretive projects, from left and right. Nietzsche and Marx was seen time and again as a double team of a concept of comprehensive emancipation beyond the well-trodden paths of dominant left-wing political trends. In his book How to Philosophize with a Hammer and Sickle. Nietzsche and Marx for the Twenty-First Century and in countless YouTube videos, Jonas Čeika updates this perspective for our time. For Nietzsche PopArts, Henry Holland addressed the question of what to think of this approach.

Nietzsche has repeatedly become the subject of political interpretive projects, from left and right. Nietzsche and Marx were seen time and again as a double team of a concept of comprehensive emancipation beyond the well-trodden paths of the dominant left-wing political tendencies. In his book How to Philosophize with a Hammer and Sickle. Nietzsche and Marx for The Twenty-First Century and in countless YouTube videos, Jonas Čeika updates this perspective for our time. For Nietzsche PopArts, Henry Holland addressed the question of what to think of this approach.