}

#

Jean-François Lyotard

Discourse, Power and Delusion

Michel Foucault's Nietzsche Interpretation Revisited

Discourse, Power and Delusion

Michel Foucault's Nietzsche Interpretation Revisited

17.2.25
Paul Stephan

The humanities scene recently experienced a minor sensation: In the estate of Michel Foucault (1926—1984), one of the most important representatives of post-structuralism, its editors came across an elaborate book manuscript with the title Le discours philosophique, on which the avowed Nietzschean had worked in 1966. It was published in German by Suhrkamp in 2024. Nietzsche plays a decisive role in this comprehensive analysis of philosophical discourse since Descartes. Paul Stephan takes this event as an opportunity to take a closer look at the most influential Nietzsche interpretation of the 20th century to date.

The humanities scene recently experienced a minor sensation: In the estate of Michel Foucault (1926—1984), one of the most important representatives of post-structuralism, its editors came across an elaborate book manuscript entitled Le Discours Philosophique, which the avowed Nietzschean had worked on in 1966. In 2024, it was published in German by Suhrkamp. Nietzsche plays a decisive role in this comprehensive analysis of philosophical discourse since Descartes. Paul Stephan takes this event as an opportunity to take a closer look at the most influential Nietzsche interpretation of the 20th century to date.

Caught in the Crossfire of the Culture Wars, There Stands Nietzsche

Comparing Two Current Perspectives

Caught in the Crossfire of the Culture Wars, There Stands Nietzsche

Comparing Two Current Perspectives

27.11.24
Paul Stephan

It is well known that Nietzsche's history of influence has been read and absorbed across all political camps. But what about our present tense? Paul Stephan examines the writings of two authors who are about the same age as himself, in their mid/late 30s, and whose perspectives on Nietzsche could hardly be more different: While French journalist and YouTuber Julien Rochedy declares Nietzsche a pioneer of a right-wing cultural struggle, the German philosopher and political scientist Karsten Schubert attacks him for a left-wing identity politics. Both positions do not really convince our authors; rather, they are entirely within the framework of the prevailing simulation of politics as a cultural struggle, which would need to be countered by focusing on the really pressing life problems of contemporary humanity.

It is well known that Nietzsche's history of influence has been read and absorbed across all political camps. But what about our present tense? Paul Stephan examines the writings of two authors who are about the same age as himself, in their mid/late 30s, and whose perspectives on Nietzsche could hardly be more different: While French journalist and YouTuber Julien Rochedy declares Nietzsche a pioneer of a right-wing cultural struggle, the German philosopher and political scientist Karsten Schubert attacks him for a left-wing identity politics. Both positions do not really convince our authors; rather, they are entirely within the framework of the prevailing simulation of politics as a cultural struggle, which would need to be countered by focusing on the really pressing life problems of contemporary humanity.

Wrangling Over The Will: The Nietzschean-Marxian Legacy

About Jonas Čeika's How to Philosophize with a Hammer and Sickle

Wrangling Over The Will: The Nietzschean-Marxian Legacy

About Jonas Čeika's How to Philosophize with a Hammer and Sickle

26.4.24
Henry Holland

Nietzsche has repeatedly become the subject of political interpretive projects, from left and right. Nietzsche and Marx was seen time and again as a double team of a concept of comprehensive emancipation beyond the well-trodden paths of dominant left-wing political trends. In his book How to Philosophize with a Hammer and Sickle. Nietzsche and Marx for the Twenty-First Century and in countless YouTube videos, Jonas Čeika updates this perspective for our time. For Nietzsche PopArts, Henry Holland addressed the question of what to think of this approach.

Nietzsche has repeatedly become the subject of political interpretive projects, from left and right. Nietzsche and Marx were seen time and again as a double team of a concept of comprehensive emancipation beyond the well-trodden paths of the dominant left-wing political tendencies. In his book How to Philosophize with a Hammer and Sickle. Nietzsche and Marx for The Twenty-First Century and in countless YouTube videos, Jonas Čeika updates this perspective for our time. For Nietzsche PopArts, Henry Holland addressed the question of what to think of this approach.

From Stalin to Nietzsche, or How I Became a Nietzschean, 1970-1990

From Stalin to Nietzsche, or How I Became a Nietzschean, 1970-1990

4.4.24
Hans-Martin Schönherr-Mann

As a Marxist, Nietzsche was an early nuisance. But with the Nietzsche Renaissance in the eighties, I couldn't get past him anymore. That's when I discovered Nietzsche as an innovative thinker. - Part II of the series “What does Nietzsche mean to me? “, in which our regular authors introduce themselves.

As a Marxist, Nietzsche was an early nuisance. But with the Nietzsche Renaissance in the eighties, I couldn't get past him anymore. That's when I discovered Nietzsche as an innovative thinker. - Part II of the series “What does Nietzsche mean to me? “, in which our regular authors introduce themselves.